Page 24 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 24

CAUSALITY RELATIONS IN ECONOMIC PROCESSES: METHODOLOGY  INTERPRETATION



               modernism. At least, in the third part of the world (Azerbaijan is

               included in this part) the process of modernism is intensively
               developing. As we can see the economic time is not simultaneous. The

               world is experiencing the different economic periods.
                     The differentiation of the economic time is measured not by physical

               units; it can be explained by variety of concepts. Postmodern period means

               that material capacity of production should be shifted to the minimum level.
               In developed countries the service sector of the economy accounts for 2/3 of

               GDP. The differentiation mentioned above refers not only to structure of
               social production, but also to other areas affected by it. Thus the existence

               and development conditions of society  within some particular period of

               time are formed under the pressure of causality relations and system of
               interrelated values. From this point of view the concepts of “present” and

               “past” should be treated based on their real effect on economic situation.
               For example, the prior year should not be treated as a “past”, we should

               refer to this period as one of the current time lags. At the same time the
               concept of “past” refers to the period of modernism.


                     The asymmetry in economic causality

                     The asymmetry between causality and result is not related only to

               the time issue, it is also related to the time issue. From economic point of
               view the occurrence of cause and respective result at the same period of

               time is impossible, at least because simultaneity is symmetric. In
               economics symmetry is possible only in case of pure idealism, which is

               very far from realism and actual causality. Acceptance of such symmetry
               would be equal to acceptance of full neoclassic approach. From this point

               of view the reality of asymmetry is doubtless acceptable. The asymmetry

               of causality and result can be investigated from different points:

                                                 24
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29