Page 12 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics

“BREAKING” POINTS OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH PROCESS: REEDOM,
COINCIDENCE, OPPORTUNITY AND PROBABILITY

It is not met in the process of decay of main funds. This process is a regular

process. On the other side, “coincidence” met in the non-material sphere
comes after the freedom of will for both its appearance form and content.

That is, it is secondary, derivative. However, there is no universal answer to

the question “Is this a direct derivative of the freedom of will?”. In fact, the
economic relations system does not accept such “delivery” as a real creature

excluding mere theoretical plane or selecting or finding a permissible
substantiating type for this is seemed impossible. Or we can not agree with

the opinion to consider occurrence of essentially different and even
oppositely standing coincidence by chance. The same contented changes in

various social-economic and social-cultural types may cause coincidence of

various essential. In this case, which occurrence will be considered
coincidence? Or in the mentioned variations (in relation to the coincidence of

different content), by whom or how may be determined that which is real,

may be interpreted within the causality and which is of opposite pole.
Because the point is about the different planes – coincidence caused by a

change initiated for the same purpose in various social-cultural types. Our
studies show that in the mentioned environment a researcher tries to provide

interpreting view of an coincidence or to bypass interpretation by the
conclusion “this is an coincidence”. Another moment related to economic

“coincidence” appears in mutual connection between coincidence and

alternativeness. In some researches [Veretennikov V.I. 1913. V. 48. No. 11:
19-44], content volume of an coincidence are tried to be formed in

coincidence → alternate cross by promoting putting a problem in historical
pint. Or an coincidence is not a result coming from the cross of causality

rows, but “our selected reference point in studying the past ….” [Karayev
N.I. 1913. No.2.:154-155]. Economically it is principally impossible to

benefit of simplification of “reference point” (also in relation to the past) in

11