Page 107 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 107

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND  PRACTICE, V.71,  # 1, 2014,  pp. 99-119



               Francis comments use poorly chosen words, such as that “*the Conservative party] demonstrated


               the  worst  negotiating skills since  Neville Chamberlain”  in crafting the deal where “Ottawa

               capitulated on everything.”[http://opinion.financialpost.com/2012/11/02/canada‐china‐trade‐deal‐is‐

               too‐one‐sided]  The credibility gap widens when one considers that the deal is the product of 18


               years of negotiations.

                     Ultimately, the Chinese FIPA is positive for Sino-Canadian trade relations.  This is because


               it establishes rules and trade frameworks which are understood by both nations.  Ian Lee remarks

               that Canada actually has more to gain than China, as “with the rule of law prevailing in Canada

               FIPA protections are less valuable for Chinese investors in Canada than for Canadian investors


               in China.”

                     Taking steps toward creating a legal baseline to govern trade relations with China is a positive

               step.  Edy Wong comments on the balance between  “economic realism and  libertarian idealism.”


               This is very apt.  Objections driven by Idealism or ideology about the “onesidedness” of the deal

               ought to be questioned from the vantage of realism:  Canada’s ability to approach a nation forty-


               times  more populous  that holds a $32 billion dollar  trade  deficit  [http://ca.reuters.com/  article/

               businessNews/idCABRE88P16D20120926]  as  a purely  equal partner is uncertain.   Economic  realism

               suggests that  until Canada  can leverage its tactical strengths, such  as using  the Nexen  deal as a

               bargaining chip, it will be difficult to press for a fully level playing field at this point in time.


                                                     Economic Considerations

                     Misconceptions drive much of the negative perception of Chinese SOE FDI.  Perceptual

               issues notwithstanding,  the  most powerful question  that  must be  asked is  “how does the FDI


               benefit the recipient country?”  As such it is worth exploring examples where Chinese FDI has

               made a positive impact on society and the economy, especially in countries with cultures and




                                                           107
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112