Page 30 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 30

Mahmoud M. Sabra: International Capital Inflows and Government Size: Evidence from
                                                                Panel Data in Selected Mena Countries


                    Furthermore, complex vertical FDI enhanced in case of; high income in region, or similarity between
                    countries, similarity in relative factor endowments, home and third countries are different in relative
                    factor  endowments,  countries  are  different  in  relative  unskilled  labor  and  when  transport  costs
                    between countries are high, Matsuura and Hayakawa (2008). This type produces overseas in the host
                    country  to  serve  the  domestic  market  more  cheaply,  or  to  save  trade  costs,  and  targets  the  host
                    country as an exports platform FDI to serve, in addition, other countries in the region through exports
                    or more FDI, which suggested by Ekholm et al. (2003). Knowledge Capital (KC) model stands if the
                    first two previous types were merged, which combines the main features of the vertical and horizontal
                    models.]; in particular, vertical, complex vertical and Knowledge Capital model (KC)
                    types. Trade liberalization and exposure of host country encourage MNEs to invest
                    internationally and produce overseas, as long as exporting intermediate goods from
                    headquarters,  in  home  country,  to  affiliates,  in  host  country,  associated  with  low
                    barriers, and similarly, it applicable to final goods that re-exported to home country
                    or third country in the region. This, in fact, encourages MNEs decision of complex,
                    complex vertical and KC model types of FDI. Hence, positive relationship between
                    openness and FDI should be raised, in such cases. However, empirical investigations
                    would detect if such types dominant or not, in a particular economy or region. More
                    trade, employment, production reflects on government revenues and finance public
                    budget, which should influence the government size.

                    Country size and government size are associated negatively, where as population as
                    larger  the  cost  of  various  non-rival  (public)  goods  will  be  shared  over  more
                    economic units, and per capita costs of these public goods declining as  taxpayers
                    increase, from one side, and the per capita required government expenditure will be
                    lower,  from  other  side,  that  means  smaller  countries  have  relatively  larger
                    governments, and vice versa ,Alesina and Spolaore, (1997), Alesina and Wacziarg,
                    (1998), Alesina (2003).

                    Furthermore,  Wagner's  law  pointed  out  that  urbanization  may  cause  higher
                    government expenditure, which may refer to "the pressure of social progress" leads
                    to increasing government size, as long as government expenditure on  investments in
                    education, health and infrastructure relatively highly in first stages of urbanization
                    and industrialization, Cameron, (1978).

                    On the other hand, country size and openness are negatively associated as long as
                    population,  labor  force  and  markets  are  large,  which  enjoy  more  labor  division,
                    higher factor productivity that creates fewer incentives for openness in large markets
                    and economies comparing to small ones, Alesina et al. (2000).





                                                           30
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35