Page 32 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 32

DEMAND FOR DURABLE AND NON-DURABLE POLITICAL GOODS





               interests. By this token, we expect to see unions and parties allocate relatively

               more of their contributions to candidates and committees (including parties)
               than the things identified as non-durable political goods.

                       As  Table  4  shows,  advocacy  groups  in  our  sample  spent  about  436

               million  in  three  election  cycles;  17  percent  as  administrative  expenses,  13
               percent as campaign expenses, 5 percent on media, 10 percent on fundraising,

               and  almost  half  of  the  money  were  contributions  to  parties,  candidates,  or
               committees. In each cycle, more or less equal amounts were spent, i.e. $145

               million. Political party-affiliated groups spent almost two-thirds of the money,
               $277  million;  union  and  independent  spent  around  $80  million  each.  On

               average,  each  political  party  affiliated  groups  spent  $17.3  million;  unions

               $6.8million; and independents $2.4 million.  It is  interesting to  note that the
               independents spent much less than the other two types of groups. This reflects

               a  pattern  of  single-issue,  single-state  involvement.  Moreover,  independents

               spent 23 percent of their money on fund raising.
                       Each conservative group spent $12 million, almost twice as much as

               the  average  liberal  group  ($6.5  million  each).  Groups  with  unknown
               ideological  designation  spent  the  least  --  $2.4  million  each.  Furthermore,

               independents spent 27 percent of their money on fund raising. Finally, when
               we divide the groups based on the frequency of their appearance, either in

               one cycle or in three cycles, we observe that the one-shot groups spent $1.8

               million  each  compared  to  $11.7  million  for  three-cycle  groups.  One-shot
               groups also spent 13 percent of their money on fund raising (compared to

               only  4  percent  of  three-cycle  groups).  Clearly,  one-shot,  independent,
               unknown groups are spending much less than the others; and they have big

               fund  raising  expenditures.  All  in  all,  these  groups  appear  as  grass-roots
               organizations relative to party and union-affiliated ones.






                                                       31
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37