Page 73 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 73

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND  PRACTICE, V.71,  # 1, 2014,  pp. 53-79


               facility to have a market value of $ 100 million, it would not be hard to find a 15% tax deduction


               for any QET amount. If 100% funded by QET, the 15% tax deduction on a $100 million project

               would equal to  $15  million, making  22%  of  $66 million royalty revenue assumed above  on

               average.  A 22% hypothetical change in royalty revenue could  have  a substantial  impact on


               budgeting decisions during any period QETs funded.

                     Use of QETs during times with high risen crude prices would not have a sensitive impact on

               government`s budget planning. This is because increased crude prices would offset tax gains of the


               Approval Holders. However, it would be beneficial if the government ruled out a new law against the

               use of QETs during low crude prices. If we consider the fact that Supported  Infrastructure


               Organizations in Alberta (SIOs) are funded by the provincial budget then the importance of putting

               limitation on QETs during times with low oil prices would avoid possible financial distress.

                                                     3.3.  Tax impact of QETS


                     Generally, amounts paid and accrued for reclamation obligations before actual reclamation

               expenditures incurred are  not  tax  deductible  for income tax  purposes. Although statutory

               regulations  puts constraints  on tax deductibility  of the  allowed  costs for  tax  purposes it is


               allowed to deduct both, current and estimated future reclamations costs for financial reporting

               purposes under current financial  reporting standards.  To offset  this  mismatch,  qualifying

               environmental trusts paid by taxpayers are allowed as tax deductible. Moreover, the QET given


               to the trust can earn income during a year. Such income made on QET is taxed first. However,

               that same after-tax income is taxed for the second time at a corporate tax rate (15% in 2012) in

               the year it is removed from the QET resulting in an element of double taxation. Also, when the


               QET is withdrawn by the Approval Holder the taxable income is increased by the exact QET







                                                           73
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78