Page 6 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 6

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.73, # 1, 2016, pp. 4-37


                    rewarded, accordingly. Such was the understanding of the main economic law on
                    wealth distribution, which is substantially different from Karl Marx‘s reproduction
                    schemes in which the maximum utility theory prevails.
                         The  strengths  of  the  Clark  concept.  The  content  of  solving  the  set  of  the
                    objectives has been placed in the three main parts of the book. The explanations, in
                    fact, define the structure of the book. The first part consists of the chapter, dedicated
                    to  the  theoretical  economy,  named  as  the  Universal  Economic  Law,  which  is
                    designed to explore natural laws of market economy.
                         The ‗common‘ or ‗natural laws‘ of economy, according to John B. Clark, are
                    the marginal utility laws, the laws of diminishing production of labor and capital,
                    growth of global population and others.
                         These  ‗natural  economic  laws‘  simply  serve  for  defining  the  relationship
                    between  a  human  being  and  the  nature.  They  also  serve  to  define  the  relations
                    between  people.  Such  relations  were  construed  as  the  ‗laws  of  social  economy‘,
                    under John B. Clark‘s theory.
                         In the third chapter, John B. Clark is explicit in affirming that the theory basis
                    of social economy is vested on natural laws of the Universal Economic Law. The
                    title of the chapter speaks for itself: ―The Principles of Distribution of the Natural
                    Economic  Laws.‖  The  social  economic  laws,  in  their  turn,  are  split  into  two
                    branches: the laws of social economy, in their statics, as the first branch, and the
                    laws of social economy, in dynamics, as the second. John B. Clark did not focus on
                    the  study  of  relations  that  were  related  to  labor  and  capital  in  the  process  of
                    production, He avoided that since he had derived the social laws from the natural
                    economic  laws.  Thus,  he  did  not  explore  the  tendencies  hidden  in  the  organic
                    structure of the capital to the extent that Karl Marx had done it in great detail.
                         However, the part of the book titled ―Universal Economic Law‖ has proven the
                    operable  instrument  of  analysis  and  assessment  of  all  potential  regulators  of  market
                    economy. It has the theoretical, actual, and practical value. It defines the philosophy of
                    the  analysis  of  macroeconomic  processes  as  the  scientific  framework  of  analytical
                    researches.
                         The bottom line of this part of the book lies in the selection of major economic
                    laws and rules as the instruments of carrying out analytical and economic research.
                    The  question  that  arises  on  whether  the  tendencies  in  the  development  of  market
                    economy  do  exist  irrespective  of  people‘s  will  and  consciousness  in  the  manner
                    similar to the existence of laws of natural sciences or of nature?
                         John B. Clark found a positive answer to this question. He confirmed that the
                    marginal  utility  law  serves  the  fair  basis  for  the  distribution  of  wealth  created
                    amongst key production agents. John B. Clark was undeniably right and, therefore,


                                                            6
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11