Page 38 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 38

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.75, # 1, 2018, pp. 32-41


                    is  also  complementarity  between  the  Chinese  and  European  national  plans  for
                    connectivity  and  transport,  as  shown  for  example  by  the  BRI-TENT  comparison
                    (Wang et al 2017).

                    From a Chinese point of view, investments in Europe are generally aimed at finding
                    know-how and learning new management experiences.

                    China  moves  through  macro-areas  and  single  countries,  as  demonstrated  by  the
                    Central Eastern Europe 16 + 1 regional cooperation plan, launched by the Chinese
                    government  since  2012,  or  the  growing  strategic  focus  on  the  Mediterranean
                    (remember  the  figures  about  tectonic  movements).  In  the  first  case,  green  field
                    investments  prevail,  i.e.  in  new  production  activities  (branches,  new  plants,  etc.);
                    while in the second case one of the main objective is to acquire strategic assets, in
                    light of the privatization policies carried out in recent years.

                    Faced with this framework, it is important to ask some questions: how is it possible
                    to  guide  and  implement  this  worldwide  initiative?  Who  and  how  managing  the
                    complex  investments  planned  or  already  carried  out?  According  to  tradition,  the
                    Chinese  authorities  have  decided  to  first  develop  the  tools  to  support  the  new
                    investment  plans,  giving  rise  to  a  multilateral  institutional  architecture  that  is
                    structured  and  consolidated  over  time.  For  example,  there  are  some  state-owned
                    banks,  funds  and  investment  institutions  that  work  synergistically:  the  Silk  Road
                    Fund (SRF) is linked to the PBoC, the Export-Import Bank of China (EBC) and the
                    China Development Bank (CDB) have developed subsidized credit schemes for the
                    BRI  and,  together  with  the  European  Investment  Bank  (EIB),  are  some  of  the
                    financial institutions behind the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (Wang et al.
                    2017). These banks will interact with other financial institutions, such as the BRICS
                    New Development Bank, but also the World Bank.

                    BRI: Geopolitical Problems

                    Obviously the more the BRI develops and the greater the need for security, that is, of
                    control systems able to protect the new interconnections (in this regard we already
                    see developments in Algeria, Dijbouti, Srilanka and Pakistan).

                    It is possible to assert that greater involvement in the BRI would enable Europe to:
                    integrate  insufficient  resources  at  European  level  with  the  Chinese  ones;  increase
                    exports  to  Asia;  favor  the  development  of  the  most  backward  regions;  guarantee
                    relationships  of  mutual  benefit  and  therefore  favorable  to  peaceful  relations;  and
                    offer a complex, but promising, alternative to war.


                                                           38
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43