Page 49 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 49

Mbu Daniel Tambi, Mah-Soh Glennice Fosah: Econometric Modelling of Women
                                    Empowerment and Agricultural Production in Cameroon

                         2
                    The R  of the OLS is 0.2435 which implies that the regression explains about 24% of the
                    variation in agricultural production. The coefficient on women empowerment in the OLS
                    estimation is smaller than that of the 2SLS and statistically significant but is likely to be
                    biased and inappropriate for inference as the model violates the first OLS assumption.
                    This explains why women empowerment is negatively significant in the OLS model, as
                    such we limit our discussions to the 2SLS and Control function estimates. We assume
                    unobservable variables are uncorrelated with excluded instruments or that the correlation
                    in linear and the estimation sample is randomly selected from the given population of
                    interest. In order to proceed with the 2SLS estimation technique, we test for instrument
                                                                     2
                    strength  and  validity.  The  Durbin-Wu-Hausman    test  of  endogeneity  of  women
                    empowerment, tests the null hypothesis that the regressor is exogenous. As expected
                    rejection of the null hypothesis (p-value=0.0136) indicates that women empowerment is
                    endogenous, and therefore use of IV 2SLS is appropriate.

                    The F-test that the coefficients on the control variables are zero is supported and this
                    appears  consistent  with  the  fact  that  the  disturbances  are  homoskedastic.  The
                    instrument is thus valid, signifying instrument validity as it satisfies the conditions of
                    instrument relevance and exogeneity.

                    The implication is that we can rely on both the IV 2SLS and the control function
                    approach estimates. Other test such as the Sargan statistic (over identification test of
                    all  instruments)  was  conducted  which  was  statistically  significant  at  1%  level  of
                    significance. As such, we reject the null hypothesis of over identification and accept
                    the alternative of exactly identified model. This also conforms to the rule of thumb of
                    the model being exactly identified when the number of instruments equals the number
                    of  endogenous  regressors.  However,  the  Cragg-Donald  Wald  F-statistic  (14.723)
                    indicates weak identification since it less than 16.38 Stock-Yogo values. Thus the
                    instrument  is  valid  but  weak.  The  2SLS  coefficient  for  the  effect  of  women
                    empowerment on agricultural production is 1.67 which is far higher than the OLS but
                    less than the control function estimates. The coefficient is however positive in both
                    the  2SLS  and  Control  Functions  models  indicating  that  an  increase  in  women
                    empowerment leads to positive and significant increases in agricultural production.
                    Given the effect and magnitude of women empowerment effect is greatest in CFa
                    (control  function  without  interaction),  discussions  will  be  based  on  the  control
                    function without interaction since the  coefficients  of the  women empowerment  is
                    strongly  and  positively  correlated  with  agricultural  production  at  5%  level  of
                    significance.







                                                           49
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54