Page 54 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 54

THE                      JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.81, # 2, 2024, pp. 30-59


                    From table 4.5, it is  observed that,  a unit increase in  the empowerment  of single
                    women  will  lead  to  a  93%  decrease  on  agricultural  production,  even  though
                    statistically insignificant. Moreover, the results reveal that only 8% of variation in
                    agricultural production is cause by the variables of single women. Furthermore all the
                    other variables are statistically insignificant and cannot be used for inference. On the
                    other hand, the empowerment of married women will bring about a positive increase
                    in agricultural production, statistically significant at 1% level of significance. The
                    results have therefore shown that agriculture is a critical source of livelihoods for
                    married women in Cameroon and a key pathway out of poverty especially in the rural
                    area. This is seen the empowerment of women in the urban area rather brings about a
                    74% decrease in agricultural production, significant at 10% level of significance. It
                    also portrays that women in rural areas who are especially constrained by a lack of
                    access to inputs, productive resources, and services will be more productive if they
                    are empowered to gain such access.

                    The findings tie with Malhotra et al (2002) who revealed that married women may face
                    more  socio-cultural  inhibitions  even  to  participate  well  in  agriculture  due  to
                    interpersonal gender dynamics within the household, emanating from marriage systems,
                    which responsible for much of women’s social exclusion. Hence, the empowerment of
                    such women uplifts them from  cultural norms and consequently makes them more
                    productive especially if they draw on support from husbands. Also, following Novarty
                    (2005) it is observed that, married couples are likely to be more engaged in income
                    generating activities than single women due to labor reinforcement in accomplishing
                    farm and non- farm activities hence the married women are likely to be in a more
                    agriculturally  productive  situation.  This  finding  is  however  dissimilar  to  Grantham
                    (2012) who revealed that marriage strongly negatively affects women’s labour force
                    participation and productivity. This may be due to the fact that the women were not
                    empowered as in the case of our findings. As such, most all of them had limited access
                    to land, finance and farm inputs as they depend upon their husband’s land.

                    Going  by  the  results  presented  in  table  4.5  above,  it  can  be  said  that  the  model
                    specified for married women is reliable, indicated by the Wald chi2 (df): Prob>chi2,
                    which  show  that  the  explanatory  variables  are  globally  significant  in  determining
                    agricultural production. Thus, together all the regressors have a significant effect on
                                                                                         2
                    agricultural production, as the Wald statistic is significant at 1%.  The R also reveals
                    that  about  25%  of  variation  in  agricultural  production  is  been  explained  by  the
                    independent variables specified in our model, while other variables are captured in the
                    error term.






                                                           54
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59