Page 22 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 22
“BREAKING” POINTS OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH PROCESS: REEDOM,
COINCIDENCE, OPPORTUNITY AND PROBABILITY
2) Carrying out of epochal changes (for example, postmodernism type)
through the rules with clear borders in the intra-system plane (opposite pole:
chaos);
3) absence of cardinal changes in the development trajectory of a
system;
4) expressing of the intra-system mutation by probable logic terms;
5) existence of possibility of explanation of probability characterized
confirmations in the principles of causality etc.
Modern economic reality is not determined by any of these conditions.
And the challenge of the problem is that it is impossible to conduct verification
(even by computer simulation) of those conditions in non of “stops” of past →
present → future time axis. At the same time, appearance of repetition
connected with economic zone only in cycles form obviously provides
emptiness of our listed conditions from real context. Cycle is not a repetition of
an economic process. Or repetition – but in different context and different
essence! Cycle is a time covering beginning and end borders of a process. So,
the probability of repetition of an economic occurrence by time is generally and
principally impossible.
II. The main condition in repetition by space is the presence of essence
accordance between social-economic systems. That is, area of spread of an
economic occurrence and its coverage (from the point of repetition of an
occurrence as it be) may have real content only in system accordance.
From this aspect, economic process and economic occurrence do not
demonstrate the same behaving style from repetition point. So that, an
occurrence acts as one of the line elements of a process. Or a process
includes “collection” of a lot of occurrences. Repetition of an economic
process may cause repetition of similar occurrences in partial similar social-
21