Page 18 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 18

“BREAKING” POINTS OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH PROCESS: REEDOM,
                                  COINCIDENCE, OPPORTUNITY AND PROBABILITY



               and its coverage do not have so importance. So that real choice and real action

               (activity) always occur within the exactly drawn borders.
                      In relation to an economic situation, both real and formal possibility

               may  lead  different  results  from  the  point  of  realization.  It  means  that

               realization of an possibility may cause re-production of the existing system
               in one case, and impossibility of re-occurrence of the previous status in the

               other case.
                      At the same time, there are some moments of which specification is

               important in transition of possibility – reality. Possibility is not the synonym
               of possibility, that is, these terms do not have identical content in a full mean

               of  a  word.  Possibility  is  an  possibility  that  turns  to  “moving”,  dynamic

               process. Possibility is a part of the existing potential that may become urgent
               from  possibility  point.  Possibility  is  an  updating  possibility  that  occurs

               according  to  the  internal  logic  of  the  process  only,  that  is,  possibility

               transfers moving.
                      In  the  economic  context,  possibility  reflects  forming  possibility,

               possibility  the  process  in  the  possibility  of  realization,  reality  the  determined
               fact.

                      There are a lot of confused moments in relation to probability acting
               as a measure of possibility.

                      Neoporitivism  that  still  keeps  a  certain  position  in  methodology  of

               economic science, uses of logical construction that close to the statistic meaning
               of the probability in explanation in the historical context of economic coincidence.

               Attitude to the conception of inductive probability is not unanimous. K.Popper
               accepts  the  indicative  probability  of  hypothesis  or  its  proving  degree  as  a

               confirming level [Popper K. 1993:140]. J.Keins [Pyatnicin B.N. 1976: 314-316]
               understood the probability in quality of subjective category. Adding the term of






                                                       17
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23