Page 14 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 14
“BREAKING” POINTS OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH PROCESS: REEDOM,
COINCIDENCE, OPPORTUNITY AND PROBABILITY
Existence of freedom of will (in economic activity) extends the
possibility of realization of various mistakes and incorrectness substantially.
And as a result, it is tries to evaluate appeared occurrence as an coincidence.
In fact, our mentioned aspect does not have any relation to an coincidence.
Simply, preferring incorrect choices creates only “wrong” causality chain. But it
would not be correct to call this as coincidence.
Subjective approach plays main role in assessing that an occurrence
is an coincidence or not. even it is evaluated unilaterally “depending on the
view-point selected by an observer …” [Aron P. 2000:225].
Explanation of the coincidence of an occurrence in economy by only
one factor: impossibility of unilateral determination of the reasons of
happening of an occurrence provides a description of perfunctory approach
to a problem. Because, first, no occurrence (in economy) happens without
reason. Social-economic nature and inner logic of the economic process take
no heed of this aspect at all.
Second, also even existence of multi-numbered “small reasons”
(which could not be considered or “seen”) and a consolatory approach of
type committed by just such “small reasons” of an occurrence are not
acceptable. In this case, we meet simply with the desire to “avoid” a problem
of a researcher. Third, also interpretation of an coincidence as a result of the
act of freedom of will of any subject may not be considered correct. As we
mentioned before, freedom of will is not coincidental occurrence on the
economic plane, may cause incorrect and mistakes.
According to us, the real essence of coincidence of an economic
occurrence is its staying outside the system of repeated relations. Only in the event
this condition is met (considering other moments), it is possible to forward a
correct opinion that an economic occurrence is coincidence or not.
13
