Page 9 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE

role in selecting development way, but also is able to expose economic

existence to change.
Choice problem of economic subject:

freedom to choice

“Practical syllogism” by G.Kh.fon Vrigtin towards substantiating
selection of economic subject from the existing alternates from

methodological point (included to the scientific circulation from 1970s) claims
for the alternate role of the interpretation model carried out within the general

laws. He writes that “…. intends to carry out A p. A considers that it can not
carry out p without fulfilling a. So, A fulfills a”[Vrigt G.Kh. 1986:127].

Similarity between the mentioned syllogism and M.Veber’s “ideal type” is

great enough.
K.Gempel’s [Gempel K. 1977:86] rational behavior model specifies

the followings: A subject is C situation; at the same time, it operates

rationally; any rational person carries out X in C-type situation absolutely (or
high supposedly) and A carries out C.

Gempel’s interpretation model is not of so importance in economic
context absolutely. Because first, unilaterally interpretation of “rationality”

definition is impossible; second, not majority of subjects behaves “rational” as
specified by Gempel. Therefore there should be provided non-rational or

“irrational” definition in Gempel’s scheme in addition to rational. And in this

case, real content of the model changes and goes to the plane of uncertainty;
third, behavior of economic may not be considered outside the time-space

continuum. That is, the expression “any subject” should take more correct shape
in relation to behavior. Fix time frame and behavior of certain subject in

concrete space. Gempel’s expressing style and its importance is nonsense other
than nude abstraction.

8