Page 7 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE

At the same time, study of economic freedom by a researcher in

major appearances from complex to simple in scientific researches does not
mean way out from a problematic situation in it self (though the mentioned

research process faces with a number of problems). From this aspect, the

problem called “research freedom” of a researcher is of decisive importance
in many cases. Of course, the point is not the personal or speech freedom of

a researcher. The logical roots of the problem feed from its thinking mode.
Major researchers carrying out scientific research in the economic plane are

obliged to act from a certain theory or a certain provisions of such theory.
So, the determined thinking tries to disclose the essence of freedom in the

economic plane and to find out its moving features. Thus if holder of such

thinking acts on wrong provisions (purposefully or unawares), then in the
best case, incorrectness of his/her made conclusions is unavoidable. Just

from this aspect, correct description of the appearances of economic freedom

directly depends on correctness of the selected provisions. And our aim is to
find out those moments that may provide correctness quality to such

provisions.
Maximum of economic freedom:
freedom of will

There are 4 main approach forms to freedom of will (in philosophical
view):

1. Dialectic approach: freedom is an understandable necessity. The

more we understand our connection to causality, the more we are free.
2. Intuitionism: the freedom of will may be understood where “Me” is

not under influence of the past, in other word, acts as an extraordinary
[Lasskiy N.O. 1991: 550.]. Human “Me” may rule on the occurrences that

happen “now” by reference to its extraordinariness.

6