Page 15 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE

Thus:

1.Economic coincidence does not negate causality. A certain reason
stands on the root of each coincidental occurrence.

2.Economic coincidence is a stable occurrence standing outside the

frame of repeated relations. Though it is sounded paradoxical in initial sight,
that is, there is not “continuance” of an occurrence caused by causality, real

putting of a problem may be taken to a case understandable in this aspect. In
other word, coincidence is only in an economic process, happens in a certain

time. In that meaning, that occurrence has neither past, nor future. But its
“present” covers an extreme short time.

3.Real contented economic coincidence is a phenomenon derived of

the cross of “independently” operating causality “chains” (not depending on
coincidental or regular occurrence of “cross”). A reason making an

coincidence in “cross” may take its source from various resources. In this

meaning, existence of logic conflicts between whole and parts within the
economic creature stands on the front row and covers very large diapason.

For example, conflict between the monopolization process running in micro
level and national interests on macro level. coincidence (reading:

disturbance) appears from “cross” of different contented causality chains that
belong to each of them, anytime, etc.

4. Economic coincidence always appears as “micro” occurrence. Extreme

majority of these occurrences may rise to “macro” level only when a certain
conceptual volume development strategy is not applied in such economic space

or “selected way” is wrong etc. That is, from coincidence point, micro → macro
passage occurs by taking its source from caps existing in the whole.

14