Page 89 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE

4. Brennan, Timothy. 1987. “Why Regulated Firms Should Be Kept Out
of Unregulated Markets: Understanding the Divestiture in U.S. v.
AT&T.” Antitrust Bulletin 32 (3): 741-93.
5. Canada, Director of Investigation and Research. 1992. Predatory
Pricing Enforcement Guidelines. Ottawa.
6. 1993. Merger Enforcement Guidelines. Ottawa. Demsetz, Harold.
1968. “Why Regulate Utilities? ” Journal of Law and Economics 11
(April): 55-66.
7. European Commission. 1997. Commission Notice on the Definition
of the Relevant Market for the Purpose of Community Competition
Law. Brussels.
8. Fisher, Franklin M., and John J. McGowan. 1983. “On the Misuse of
Accounting Rates of Return to Infer Monopoly Profits.” American
Economic Review 73 (1): 81-97.
9. Joskow, Paul L., and Alvin K. Klevorick. 1979. “A Framework for
Analyzing Predatory Pricing Strategy.” Yale Law Journal 89
(November): 1-26.
10. Landes, William M., and Richard A. Posner. 1981. “Market Power
in Antitrust Cases.” Harvard Law Review 5 (March): 937-96.
11. McGrath, J. Paul. 1984. “Patent Licensing: A Fresh Look at
Antitrust Principles in a Changing Economic Environment.” Patent
and Trademark Review 82 (9): 355-65.
12. Ordover, Janusz A., and Garth Saloner. 1989.
13. “Predation, Monopolization and Antitrust.” In Richard
Schmalensee and Robert Willig, eds., The Handbook of Industrial
Organization. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
14. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development). 1989. Competition Policy and Intellectual Property
Rights. Paris.
15. Pittman, Russell. 1994. “The Heart of Antimonopoly Investigation and
Enforcement: The Choices of Consumers.” Remarks to a seminar for
staff members of antimonopoly offices of Central and Eastern Europe,
March 7, Vienna, Austria.
- . 1995. “Some Practical Considerations in Geographic Market
Definition.” Remarks prepared for the seminar on Antitrust

88