Page 83 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.70, # 2, 2013, pp. 80-98

international role of the state changes…Now we are in the search - what will reserve currency

be, what will management model be… And that who find such decision, will make great spurt”
[Lisitsina I. 2013 p.15].

D.A.Medvedev was sure that development of state programs which allow concentrating
recourses to priority development directions is close to the end. Purposefully redundant

investment barriers are removed, the efficiency of public governance structures, which in recent
months, according to the Premier was acquired quite stable dynamics is increased. G. Gref called

for the rapid development and using state regulators that would face world standards and lay

down appropriate rules for market agents. And he suggested to begin to establish “rules of the
game” from “improvement of governance quality”. A. Siluanov called for strengthening of

financial regulation at the global level and control of financial institutions in the country. His

view is “to improve the competitiveness of our economy by optimizing the budget fiscal policy”.
A. Chubaise called for necessary increasing quality of state regulation of innovative

development of the country and “creating new, not raw mechanisms of development”. P. Lamu
considers: “Russia is a country with rich natural recourses, human and financial capitals. The

spectrum of opportunities for developing new economic model is in combination of these three
elements” [Lisitsina I. 2013 p.14]. There were opinions of new economic regulation model

formation of sub-national character (Anhel Gurria).

The role of state-legal regulators in socio-economic development was analyzed and
evaluated at the Moscow economic forum (20-21.03.2013), organized by Moscow state

university, named by M.V.Lomonosov. Famous economic experts from Russia, the USA, The
European Union and Latin America, China and CIS countries faced the problems in which most

of citizens of Russia, CIS and other countries are interested in: why are taxes in Russia high but
budget means are so scantly? Why is professor’s salary less than bank clerk’s salary? Also why

do our Russian billionaires make their capital in Russia, but save it in countries of West Europe?

The answers were and now are stayed as different, but they can be separate into two big groups.
The first group, as concerns to Forum’s participators, includes problems of denying of the

“brutality of market fundamentalism, not returning to the directive-bureaucratic planning and not

repeating mistakes of socio-democrats of the middle of XX century” [Grinberg R., Buzgalin A.
2013 p.7]. Solution of the issue is proposed by the representatives of China, Latin America, the

CIS and other countries and is reduced to the rejection of the “mythological” exaggeration of the

82