Page 87 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 87
THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.70, # 2, 2013, pp. 80-98
the past. It is no coincidence in the press critical publications began to appear such as: “The
reform of the school is as an obsession . Government officials, let’s leave teachers and kids
alone!” [Moskovsky Komsomolets. 20137 p.7 ] . Or : “How to calculate your future retirement?”
“MK” learned a new formula to save Russians” [Moskovsky Komsomolets. 20137 p. 6].
Fourth, a fundamental precept of not only a doctor but also an officials, scientist, teacher ,
educator , businessman , worker and every citizen in the modern conditions must be biblical
commandment – “Do not to harm” Do not to harm neighbor, do not to harm far. Do not to harm,
finally, the collective, the country, the world community ... Opportunities of “harming” in the
modern and quickly updated world are many and often it is very difficult under the guise of
originality and tempting promises of “rapid” and “effective” (project of “Petrick – Gryzlov” for
example, to provide all the Russians to have the cleanest water) solutions, the ideas and
solutions of dubious and even extremely harmful content are “jammed throw” and “are thrown”
into the public consciousness. Unfortunately, for this purpose in the Russian Federation an
appropriate atmosphere in the form of an extremely low level of professional managers at all
levels, and are at their officials has created. The favored “on the bones” of professionals vertical
power with a persistence worthy of a more useful application, filled all “niche” of power-
management structure and obliging and “close” people who very often is not only able to voice
their opinion to manager, but not having any opinion. That is a permanent “carousel” of reforms,
transforming society into members of pointless experiments and the object of ridicule of the
civilized world community with their high level of professionalism to distinguish between
obsequiousness of Russian official and elementary incompetence.
The economic substance of SLR is differently shown in the literature. Some authors see the
essence of their creation using SLR “Values” for people and market agents [A. Molchanov. 2011 p.9
-10]. Other (V.A. Tambovtsev, in particular) see them as “economic benefit” that can meet the
specific human need for certainty [Tambovtsev V.L. 2013 p. 161]. According to O. Tarhanov
[Tarkhanov O. 2012 p.24], SLR serve “the common benefit” (CB) or an economic benefit (EB) in
the condition that they, on the one hand, satisfy a human, collective or society in general need, and
on the other - to minimize the social (political, social, economic, environmental, international and
other) risks of sustainable and socially responsible development of the society in accordance with the
fundamental principles of the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
What special needs of society members does state regulators make to be economic benefit?
86

