Page 91 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 91

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.70,  # 2, 2013,  pp. 80-98



                     Sociological polls of 362 members of the 11th Russian Economic Congress (REC), and it is

               leading scientific elite of Russia, shows a serious concern of the scientific community for the state of
               the economy and the possibility of correcting the current level of management. The situation in the

               Russian economy is evaluated by 14% of respondents as satisfactory as a whole, 51 % - as tense, and
               almost  a  third  (32%)  -  as  a  crisis  or  catastrophic  [Bogorov  V.  2013  p.9-10].  With  the  notable

               preference for members of Congress pointed out the danger of risks related to corruption (73%) and
               the incompetence of the authorities (62 %). Serious concerns members of Congress have expressed

               the weak protection of property rights (40%), the course of economic reforms in Russia (38%), while

               55% of respondents negatively assessed the ongoing transformation of the economy.
                       These  facts  are  to  some  extent  affected  the  estimates  of  the  economic  policy  of  the

               Government of the Russian Federation as a whole. Only 3 % of respondents rated it highly, 38 % -

               not  high  enough,  and  49%  gave  it  a  negative  rating  .  Most  critically  evaluated  industrial  and
               scientific-technical policy (66%), the policy of innovative development (59%), agricultural policy

               (56%),  investment  policy  (53%).  Monetary  policy,  fiscal  policy,  monetary  policy  management,
               foreign policy, defense policy is less critically evaluated [Bogorov V. 2013. p.10].

                     Using  generic  indicators  for  the  objective  evaluation  of  the  quality  of  SLR  and  their
               effective impact on regulated relations and processes depends, in our opinion, on the internal

               structure of SLR and procedures of their impact on the regulated entity. Consideration of these

               issues  is  proposed  by  optimizing  the  structural  and  logical  model  of  state-legal  regulation  of
               social, economic, and social relations and processes.

                     Structural and logical model of social relation regulation
                     In the jurisprudence is that, as a “cell” of rights, each individual legal norm as SLR has a

               complex internal structure. First of all, every legal rule is intended to regulate the relationship
               between  people  in  the  interests  of  “coordinated  development”    of  society  and  each  of  its

               members.  Traditionally,  every  legal  norm  controller  consists  of  three  elements:  a  hypothesis,

               dispositions  and  sanctions.  The  hypothesis  in  the  short  form  characterizes  society's  need  to
               improve the regulatory effect on the object in the interest of sustainability of development. The

               specific  life  circumstances  (conditions),  the  presence  or  absence  of  which  triggers  the

               mechanism of SLR are described. Depending on the amount circumstances prescribed normal,
               simple and complex  hypothesis are identified.  An alternative hypothesis is that connects the

               regulator action with one of more of the circumstances.


                                                             90
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96