Page 106 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 106

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.77, # 1, 2020, pp.100-112




                    5  of  these  two  sectors  to  the  positive  and  high  skewness  values  for  the  previously
                    mentioned sectors, it can be argued that these sectors had lower shares during the post-
                    boom era compared to the pre-booming period. High positive kurtosis values can be
                    understood with reference to the fact that, in the 1990s and early 2000s, the national
                    currency was overvalued and competitiveness had been lost, leading to a decrease in the
                    employment, and output level. For this reason, relatively high levels of employment in
                    these sectors are not observed during recent years.

                    Table 1: Descriptive statistics of employment in economic sectors, 2000–2018.
                                     In thousand persons                      In year on year %

                                   Mining   Manufacturing   Services   Agriculture   Mining   Manufacturing   Services   Agriculture




                     Observation   19    19     19     19   Observation   18    18     18      18
                     number (n)                              number (n)
                        Min                                    Min
                                 33.70   84.80   895.80   36.40         -12.63   -23.39   -0.41   -34.29
                        Max      41.00   143.20   1288.60   90.00   Max   11.36   9.79   7.16   25.55
                       Range     -7.30   -58.40   -392.80   -53.60   Range   -23.99   -33.18   -7.57   -59.84
                       Mean      36.91   103.56   1140.72   48.19   Mean   -0.67   -1.13   2.06   -2.17
                       Mode                                    Mode
                                 35.50   N/A   N/A    N/A               #N/A   #N/A   #N/A    #N/A
                       Median    35.50   102.90   1157.20   45.30   Median   -0.27   0.19   1.53   1.66
                      Standard                                Standard
                      Deviation   2.72   11.81   128.54   11.71   Deviation   5.71   8.55   2.13   13.05
                      Variance   7.38   139.40   16522.63   137.15   Variance   32.63   73.12   4.55   170.35
                     Coefficient                             Coefficient
                     of Variation   0.07   0.11   0.11   0.24   of Variation   -8.52   -7.59   1.03   -6.03
                      Skewness   0.33   2.01   -0.44   2.94   Skewness   -0.13   -1.04   0.87   -0.85
                      Kurtosis                                Kurtosis
                                 -1.69   6.93   -1.04   9.58             1.46   1.09   0.27    2.35
                    Source: SSCRA and author’s own calculations.

                    In year on year growth rate terms (the right-hand side of Table 1), the highest and
                    the only positive mean value was in services (2.06) while agriculture suffered a  -
                    2.17 growth rate between 2000–2018. The mean value for manufacturing growth (-
                    1.13) was higher than mining (-0.67). The descriptive statistical analysis shows that
                    services was the only sector that had positive skewness, while the negative skewness
                    of mining, manufacturing, and agriculture indicated their higher levels from the pre-
                    boom and late 1990s. The lower kurtosis values for manufacturing and services can
                    be interpreted as their relatively normal distribution around the mean, while mining
                    and agriculture had volatile growth rates over the period.




                                                           106
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111