Page 40 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 40

9.   Fuad Selamzade: Measurement of the Efficiency of Azerbaijan Region Hotel
                        10.                                 Organization:  Window Analysis and Malmquist Index


                    As it can be seen from Figure 1, Baku has the closest scores to 1 in the windows


                    where  it  is  not  efficient,  according  to  the  results  of  the  window  analysis.  When
                    examining the mean efficiency scores of the regions from the Figure, it is observed
                    that the Baku region has values close to the full efficiency score in seven windows,
                    and the efficiency scores decreased in the last three windows, that is, 2013-2018.
                    Although the increasing  direction of the Absheron region's  mean efficiency  score
                    shows a trend up to the sixth window, it declined, after the seventh window. The
                    Ganja-Kazah,  Sheki-Zakatala,  Lankaran  and  Aran  regions  first  had  a  decreasing
                    trend  and  then  an  increasing  trend  of  efficiency.  The  mean  efficiency  scores  of
                    Kuba-Khachmaz and mountainous Aran regions decreased in the last windows.

                    The efficiency scores for the regions according to the estimated years as a result of
                    the constant scale window analysis are presented in Table 2. Baku region was fully
                    efficient in 2006-2009, 2011-2013 ve 2018, Absheron region in 2012, Ganja-Gazakh
                    region in 2017, Sheki-Zakatala in 2016 and 2018, Lankaran in 2006-2009 and 2014,
                    Kuba-Khachmaz in 2011 and 2012, Aran region in 2006-2008 and Nakhchivan A.R.
                    in  2012-2018.  Another  point  that  attracts  attention  is  that  Mountainous  Shirvan
                    region is not effective in any year.
                    It is also seen that in 2010 no region was efficient, the highest efficiency score was
                    99,8%  (Sheki  Zakatala)  and  the  lowest  efficiency  score  was  46,2%  (Absheron).
                    From Table 2, it was found that mean efficiency of regions according to years was
                    below 80% in 2010, 2013-2016 and above 80% in 2006-2009, 2012, 2017 and 2018.

                    Efficiency score results obtained by output-oriented, variable-scale window analysis
                    are presented in Table 3. According to the results of the analysis, it was found that
                    Baku,  Lenkeran,  Aran  and  Mountainous  Shirvan  were  fully  efficient  in  the  first
                    window, Baku in the second and sixth windows, Baku, Absheron and Nakhchivan
                    A.R. in the seventh window and regions of Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic in the
                    eight, nine and tenth Windows.

                    It was found that no region obtained efficiency score in the third and fourth windows,
                    but in the third and fourth windows, Baku (99,1% in both windows) and in the fifth
                    window, Nakhchivan A.R. (99,3%) regions had the highest efficiency scores, and in
                    the third window, Absheron (65,1%), in the fourth window, Ganja-Gazakh (73,8%)
                    and in the fifth window, Aran (74%) had the lowest efficiency scores.







                                                           40
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45