Page 39 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics

THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.77, # 1, 2020, pp. 31-50

Table 1: Average Through Window (Win-O-C)

Win1 Win2 Win3 Win4 Win5
Regions
2006-09 2007-10 2008-11 2009-12 2010-13
Baku 1 1 0,989 0,987 0,989
Absheron 0,507 0,503 0,577 0,668 0,701
Ganja-Gazakh 0,770 0,722 0,698 0,680 0,724
Sheki-Zagatala 0,711 0,833 0,828 0,760 0,757
Lankaran 1 0,929 0,846 0,760 0,774
Kuba-Khachmaz 0,855 0,849 0,822 0,896 0,890
Aran 1 0,939 0,804 0,707 0,704
Mountain Shirvan 0,834 0,813 0,757 0,685 0,726
Nakhchivan A. R. 0,878 0,822 0,861 0,921 0,992
Win6 Win7 Win8 Win9 Win10
Regions
2011-14 2012-15 2013-16 2014-17 2015-18
Baku 1 1 0,985 0,929 0,896
Absheron 0,758 0,695 0,616 0,660 0,593
Ganja-Gazakh 0,718 0,738 0,822 0,866 0,893
Sheki-Zagatala 0,636 0,534 0,630 0,709 0,824
Lankaran 0,866 0,849 0,919 0,922 0,840
Kuba-Khachmaz 0,854 0,773 0,855 0,770 0,697
Aran 0,588 0,512 0,565 0,602 0,676
Mountain Shirvan 0,803 0,780 0,716 0,683 0,549
Nakhchivan A. R. 0,994 1 1 1 1
As it can be seen from Table 1, the region with the lowest mean efficiency score in
the first five windows was Absheron, in the sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth
windows, it was found to be Aran and in the tenth window, it was found to be
Mountainous Shirvan. Baku was fully efficient in four windows including 2006-
2009, 2007-2010, 2011-2014 and 2012-2015, Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic
was fully efficient in four windows including 2012-2015, 2013-2016, 2014-2017
and 2015-2018 and each of Lankaran and Aran regions were fully efficient in one
window including the 2006-2009.

Figure 1: Mean Scores (CCR) of Regions in Window Analysis

39