Page 8 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 8

THE        JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.79, # 2, 2022, pp. 4-18

                    If individuals realize that they could have common profitable cooperation beyond the
                    borders  as  well  as  within  borders,  they  will  avoid  conflict  and  war  (Jackson  &
                    Sorensen, 2004).

                    If interdependency is in accordance with liberal or open economic systems, the states
                    will conclude that their development is dependent on trade. This freedom forces them
                    to rely on interdependency and develop it. The countries which have some share in
                    the economy of each other will come to this conclusion that by increasing desirable
                    trade relations it will divert them away from resorting to military practices to promote
                    international  status.  The  openness  or  closeness  of  economic  systems  or  lack  of
                    economic  freedom  also  has  a  reverse  effect.  If  countries  are  not  able  to  continue
                    trading because of barriers or high tariffs, they try to acquire assets, which they were
                    not able to  acquire through trade from non-peaceful ways such as  war. In such a
                    situation, the grounds for increasing militarism will be laid in the international arena
                    (Roseckranse, 1996).

                    In  this  paper,  international  economic  cooperation  and  its  effect  on  international
                    relations (peace) will be studied by presenting a theoretical model. It seeks to answer
                    this  question  as  to  whether  economic  cooperation  in  the  form  of  international
                    investment could prevent war and reduce political tensions or not? The present study
                    tries to provide a scientific response to this question using “Game theory”.

                    CONFLICTING PROPOSITIONS AND GAME THEORY
                    Since Plato,-if we imagine him as a symbolic founder of rationality, human beings
                    had some basic beliefs in the theory of rational thinking  that lasted until the second
                    half of the 20th century without facing any serious challenge. Some of them include:
                    "Every proposition is either true or false", "every correct proposition can be proved
                    anyway, although it may be difficult to prove", "resolving any conflict is equal to
                    defeat  of  one  or  both  of  parties".  Some  of  the  intellectual  achievements  of  the
                    twentieth century, and specifically the second half of the twentieth century, include
                    challenging these type of conclusions by logicians and in particular, mathematicians.
                    In the first case it was proved that there are many propositions that are neither true nor
                    false. This has led to changes in some mathematical disciplines that yielded interesting
                    achievements. Concerning the second case, it was proved that there are many correct
                    and true propositions that cannot be proved; rather, the dimension of unverifiable
                    correct options is wider than verifiable and provable propositions. This subject did not
                    only show the limitations and confinement of human rationality; it also opened up a
                    new and wider range of rationality to humanity. The origin of game theory is in the
                    third area of logicians' achievements in the twentieth century; i.e. the possibility of
                    cooperation and balance in conflict (Tabibian, 2010).




                                                            8
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13