Page 78 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 78

STUDYING OF SPECIAL PRACTICAL ISSUES OF ABUSE OF DOMINANCE


               competition in the long run by providing incentives for the development and

               production  of  new  products  and  production  processes.  In  most  cases  it  is
               possible to find a number of substitutes in the market also for products that

               are  protected  by  intellectual  property  rights  [see,  for  example,  McGrath

               1984: 355-65]. As a result, the existence and exercise of such rights should
               not usually be a source of concern to antitrust authorities.

                     Nevertheless, abuses in the acquisition and exercise of these rights can
               be a legitimate concern for competition authorities in some cases. Practices

               that  may  raise  competition  issues  fall  into  three  main  categories:  the
               acquisition  of  patents,  the  transfer  of  technology  through  licensing

               arrangements, and cooperative arrangements among innovating firms. These

               practices  raise  concerns  when  they  constitute  attempts  to  extend  market
               power by excluding entry into a market, suppressing innovation. At the same

               time, these practices may also serve legitimate, efficiency-related purposes

               [OECD 1989].
                     Licensing agreements are an important means of transfer of technology

               between  firms,  especially  in  the  international  context.  Such  contracts  are
               often complex and include an array of vertical and other restrictions on the

               licensee,  including  technology  grant-backs,  tie-ins,  territorial  market
               limitations, and field-of-use restrictions in technology licensing agreements.

               Broadly  speaking,  the  factors  to  be  considered  in  distinguishing

               anticompetitive  from  procompetitive  licensing  are  the  same  as  those  in
               relation to other anticompetitive practices.

                     In 1995 the U.S. antitrust authorities issued new Antitrust Guidelines for
               Intellectual Property Licensing. The guidelines emphasize that the treatment of

               licensing  arrangements  depends  importantly  on  whether  the  relationships
               between the firms involved are primarily horizontal or vertical. Competition is

               more likely to be harmed when the firms are horizontally related (that is, they



                                                       77
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83