Page 8 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 8
Adalat J. Muradov, Nazim O. Hajiyev: Competitive environment is the main factor for integration
into the world economy
Description of middle age welfare represents some characteristics of daily economic life
of Soviet society. Such level of similarity creates possible historical repetition thought on
development of monopoly structures forming in economical environments (economical
environments in the middle age cities and soviet society) which qualitatively different and
distant from each other. A question is rising in this situation: Are there any similarity in
development of competition relations between different historical periods which separated from
each other hundred years, too? In order to answer this question let’s follow the destruction of
manufacture monopoly and its transforming to free competition.
The monopoly power of manufactures over the local markets is based on the
unchangeable nature and static character of these markets. Only manufacture production could
cope with the payment of public needs problem under such conditions. Manufacture production
started to lose monopoly position since XVII century in which markets eventually began to grow
and structure of needs changed. Such extremely accelerated historical process with the help of
industrial revolution that allowed free competition to go on work.
This process allowed strengthening of competition, creation of national states and
the establishment of single national markets in Western Europe. Manufacture production
organized as conservative and monopoly hadn’t enough power to meet the growing needs of
national states and national markets. The states distributed the production of new sectors:
silk and cotton cloth, textile products, carpets, porcelain and etc. surely, these productions are not
in the area of influence of manufactures. Relatively big manufactures were established in
England, France and in some other countries with the assistance of state power. Manufacture
production was serious rival for workshop art.
8