Page 5 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 5

Shaikh A. Hamid, Tej S. Dhakar: Anamolous Behavior of the Volatility of Nasdaq
                                                        Composite Index: 1971 To 2017

                    I. INTRODUCTION AND LITERA TURE SURVEY

                    Existence of market anomalies have been explored for various assets based on their
                    returns. Understanding of volatility is crucial for traders, analysts, and policy-makers.

                    At least two studies have looked at the day-of the-week effect in the volatility of stock
                    markets (Berument and Klymaz [2001] and Klymaz and Berument [2003]). Cochran,
                    Heck, and Shaffer (2003) explore volatility of world equity markets. Gerlach (2005)
                    analyze effect of imperfect information on stock market volatility. Jones, Walker and
                    Wilson (2004) look at extreme day measures to analyze stock market volatility. Kim,
                    Morley  and  Nelson  (2004)  explore  relationship  between  volatility  and  equity
                    premium. Du and Shang-Jin (2004) analyze if insider trading raises volatility. Possibly
                    no study has looked at the existence of month effect in terms of volatilities – specially
                    in the NASDAQ Composite Index. If the markets are highly efficient, we would not
                    expect  to  see  significant  month-to-month  differences  in  volatilities.  We  intend  to
                    contribute to the formidable literature on market anomalies by exploring month-to-
                    month differences in volatilities in the Nasdaq Composite Index – one of the most
                    popular  stock  indexes  in  the  world.  We  also  want  to  explore  if  volatilities  have
                    increased in recent decades as is the popular perception.

                    We define volatility in terms of mean absolute percent change (MAPC) rather than
                    standard deviation. We use the percent change as it is not affected by the scale given
                    that  the  NASDAQ  Composite  Index  has  increased  manifold  since  inception.
                    Secondly, MAPC is preferable since the standard deviation tends to give more weight
                    to larger % changes than the smaller percentage changes. Lastly, the investors are
                    concerned by the percentage changes as the returns from the stock market correlate
                    more directly with the percentage changes.

                    We  explore  volatility  of  the  NASDAQ  Composite  Index  from  the  inception  in
                    February 1971 to December 2017 principally from two perspectives: (a) if the MAPC
                    of the monthly percentage changes for a month was different from the MAPC of the
                    remaining months of the year, and (b) if the MAPC based on daily percentage changes
                    for a month was different from the MAPC of the remaining months of the year. The
                    findings  of  the  study  will  guide  practicing  analysts  to  achieve  better  timing  for
                    investing in NASDAQ stocks.

                    The next section describes the methodology used, description of data and descriptive
                    statistics, analysis of results, and finally we summarize and conclude.
                                                            5
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10