Page 80 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 80

Safwan Al Salaimeh, Shadi Al Shwawreh: Monitoring System as Method of Intellectual Evaluation of
                                                                                               student’s Exams

                    The developers of PS provide a limitation when designing a question only factual
                    material of the domain (for example: there is a fact, no fact) and cannot build questions
                    by cause – effect relations, anticipating answers with varying degrees of confidence.
                    It seem expedition to use  intellectual assessment of students’ knowledge.

                    2.FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM


                    We will construct a system for assessment the knowledge of trainees that allows:

                    1. Take into account of complexity of the problem without weighting coefficient, that
                      is, without recourse to the training of experts built;

                    2. Answer questions as follows: “I am of the fairness of answer option number () by
                      () percentage” or “I am sure with fairness in justice () answer options”.

                    The task of presenting an assessment to the trainees is viewed as a mapping:

                                 ∗
                                        ∗
                                            ∗
                                           = {   ,    , … ,    } →    = {   ,    , … ,    },                                (1)
                                                   ∗
                                                                            
                                        1
                                            2
                                                               1
                                                     
                                                                   2

                                                                                           ̅̅̅̅̅
                            ∗
                    Where    - multiple response level of particular trainee, wherein      ,        = 1,    – level
                        th
                    of  i  response to the question of monitoring systems (it belongs below a lot of  fuzzy
                    terms {L – low, La –below average, A- average, Aa – above average, H - high});  n-
                    number of question of monitoring system; D – set of estimates; m- upper limit of the
                    scoring[4-7].

                    For example, if m=4, the d1 – unsatisfactory (2); d2- satisfactory (3); d3 – good (4); d4
                    – excellent (5).

                                                                                                   +
                    Other (m>4) bounds. For example, if m=10, then d10- bigger than very excellent (5 );
                                                          -
                    d9- excellent (5); d8 –almost perfectly (5 ); as so on.

                    We form the task of assessing knowledge of trainees using monitoring system based
                                                                                     ̅̅̅̅̅
                    on fuzzy logic: by the levels of response of particular trainees    = 1,    , determined
                                                                                   
                    by it is work all monitoring system, it is necessary to find some rules of inference,
                    with the help of which to get an assessment of this trainee.

                    3.METHOD OF EVALUATION

                    The process of obtaining an evaluation     does break to a several stages:
                                                             

                                                           80
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85