Page 13 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics

Maddallah basheer aboud Al: The Impact of Transformatıonal Leadershıp on Strategıc Agılıty an Empırıcal
Study at The Aqaba Specıal Economıc Zone Authorıty

STUDY TOOL:
The questionnaire for the study was developed based on the theoretical framework
and previous studies on the topic, and the questionnaire consisted of three parts:
The first part: It includes information expressing the characteristics of the study
sample, according to demographic variables (gender, age, job experience,
educational qualification).

Part Two: This part includes paragraphs covering the independent study variable
(transformational leadership) that were used in building this part of the questionnaire
on the dimensions of transformational leadership through the study (Al-Balushi, et
al., 2019; Al-Shukirat and Al-Jazi, 2019; Al-Jarida, 2018; Al-Jarida, 2018. ; Kuo and
Lee, 2019) and the necessary adjustments were made to it to suit the objectives of
the study, and these dimensions are: inspiring motivation, represented by paragraphs
(1-6), inspiring motivation and represented by paragraphs (7-9), creative
encouragement (10-13), individual attention. It is represented by paragraphs (14-16).
The third part: It includes paragraphs aimed at strategic agility, as the paragraphs of
this variable were guided by studying each of (Abdel Aal, 2019; Al-Mousawi, 2018;
Karumi, 2018; Al 2019, Nejatian) and it includes three sub-dimensions for
measuring strategic agility, represented in: (the dimension Strategic sensitivity,
organizational capabilities, strategic response) Likert scale was used to measure the
responses of the respondents, which calculates the weight of its paragraphs as
follows: (completely agree and represent 5 degrees), and (agree and represent 4
degrees), and (agree, agree. With a medium degree, which represents 3 degrees), (I
do not agree, represents 2 degrees) and (I do not agree at all, which represents 1).
Accordingly, if the arithmetic mean value of the paragraphs is greater than (3.68-5),
then the level of perceptions is high, but if the arithmetic mean value ranges between
(2.34-3.67) then the level of perceptions is average and if the arithmetic mean is less
than (2.33) then the level of perceptions is high. Is down. Depending on the criterion
of upper limit - lower limit.

( ℎ ℎ ℎ ℎ
− ℎ ℎ )
/( ( ))
4
5−1 = = 1.33;
3 3
From 1+1.33 = 2.33 (Weak / Low)
2.33 + 1.33 = 3.66 medium.
3.66 + 5 = 8.66 high.

13