Page 34 - Azerbaijan State University of Economics
P. 34

THE                      JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES: THEORY AND PRACTICE, V.83, # 1, 2026, pp. 20-39

                    Notes:  A  fixed-effects  quantile  panel  regression  model  is  used  to  produce  the
                    estimates, with quantiles (τ) ranging from 0.2 to 0.8., and robust standard errors are
                    calculated  at  the  national  level  using  clustering  techniques  to  take  into  account
                    possible within-group correlations. Significance: *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.10.
                    The  quantile  regression  results  in  Table  5  provide,  among  other  things,  a  more
                    complete examination of the relationship between energy and financial markets, and
                    according to these findings, threshold risks are much larger in the lower quantiles (τ
                    =  0.2-0.4).  The  negative  and  statistically  significant  coefficients  for  both  oil  and
                    electricity returns within these ranges indicate that energy shocks have a larger impact
                    during  market  downturns,  which  is  consistent  with  the  downward  asymmetry
                    discussed by Bouoiyour et al. (2017) and Mokni (2020), which implies that investors
                    typically  perceive  more  risk  during  market  downturns.  This  position  is  further
                    supported by the behavioral explanation of Bildirici and Badur (2019), which claims
                    that at times when general sentiment falls, markets become more sensitive to energy-
                    related shocks, also, policies supporting renewable energy and more comprehensive
                    transition strategies seem to reduce the effects of oil shocks, where the positive and
                    significant coefficients for the interaction factors (OIL × RENEW), (OIL × FIT) and
                    (OIL × CPO) also support this. In agreement with Apergis and Payne (2014) and Le
                    and Chang (2015), who discovered that economies with higher penetration rates of
                    renewable  energy  are  less  vulnerable  to  global  energy  volatility,  this  data  lends
                    credence to the policy buffer hypothesis. The resilience created by green transition
                    strategies  is  demonstrated  by  the  fact  that,  economically,  a  one  percentage  point
                    increase in the share of renewable energy seems to lessen the marginal impact of oil
                    shocks  on  stock  returns  by  about  30%.  The  decreasing  significance  of  oil-related
                    coefficients at higher quantiles (τ = 0.6-0.8) indicates that bullish markets are better
                    able  to  withstand  energy  shocks;  this  is  a  pattern  that  has  also  been  observed  in
                    developed  economies  by  Hamilton  (2009)  and  Sadorsky  (1999).  All  of  the  data
                    presented  in  Table  5  together  highlight  how  diverse  energy-finance  transmission
                    mechanisms  are  and  help  to  close  the  conceptual  divide  between  studies  on
                    sustainability and financial stability. Overall, the findings provide empirical support
                    for the idea that well-crafted transition and renewable energy policies improve an
                    economy's resilience to outside shocks and maintain financial stability.

                    5. Conclusion
                    The study explored the relationships between changes in oil and electricity prices and
                    stock markets in six emerging and transitional economies: Croatia, Greece, Slovenia,
                    India, South Africa, and Vietnam between 2010 - 2024. Using a range of nonlinear
                    econometric  methods,  including  panel  quantile  regressions,  copula  dependence
                    measures, DCC-GARCH, Markov-Switching Granger causality, and the Panel MS-




                                                           34
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39